Yes, They are Coming for Your Stove
...and your car, your furnace, your water heater, even your fireplace
UPDATE: New York Set to Pass First Statewide Law Banning Gas Stoves
It’s here, folks. They are going all-in despite what you think.
Just a quick Sunday update that I just had to share with my subscribers (and thank you all for joining in this very important conversation!).
This morning, I came across a vitally important read from James P. Pinkerton published in Breitbart News as it dovetails nicely into the series I am working on that explores the real agenda behind the democrat left’s mother-earth-saving 15-minute cities, green cities, eco-districts, net-zero settlements, and smart cities or whatever you want to call them because they are all essentially the same exact thing— a method of living designed by them as a means to control you.
From the article:
In the meantime, here at Breitbart News, this author has warned that the greens were not going to give up on another of their long-term goals, getting rid of gas stoves. And in fact, just in the past few weeks, there’s been a flurry of green reports and MSM touts, as well as scoops from Fox News and Bloomberg News on ongoing Biden administration efforts to snuff out stoves. A headline on February 6: “U.S. officials eye new route to ban gas stoves.” On February 7, The Boston Globe expanded the green’s anti-household agenda beyond stoves, worrying that “cooking appliances aren’t the only household items that run on methane gas,” and citing the menace of furnaces, water heaters, and fireplaces.
So, yeah. They want your stove and a whole lot more including your car since according to Pinkerton even purchasing an overpriced EV vehicle will eventually no longer suffice when it comes to the greenies and their net-zero agenda:
The hardcore greens want action against lithium—and against EVs and against the Biden administration. One such is Kate Aronoff, who writes for The New Republic, a venerable liberal publication, dating back to 1914, that has lately gone woke and left, as well as hard green. Aronoff tweeted her own mockery of Biden for his Hummer tweet and then wrote in her magazine, “Investing in mass transit, walkability, biking infrastructure, and other means of reducing personal car ownership . . . could reduce the amount of lithium needed.”
Now do you understand what’s up with the big push to hoard everyone into these dystopian mega cities where there will be no roads or cars and where 95% of land is preserved for nature?
The net-zero agenda is moving forward at rapid pace and is currently being implemented right under our noses while the majority of the population is busy being distracted by Chinese spy balloons and UFO’s.
Very interesting article! Very scary stuff going on.
Just had an interesting conversation with a climate change activist who at first scoffed at the idea of "they are coming to take your gas stove, etc." No, they are not coming to take your stove in the sense of breaking into your house and taking it, they will just not make it possible for you to replace it. I said, isn't that pretty much the same end result? We talked a lot about income inequality and housing issues--particularly regarding mobile home parks, and I think some lightbulbs went off in her head. Such as, what good does it do to subsidize retrofitting, solar/wind, heat pumps, new appliances, etc. for people who rent or live in mobile home parks, when the big issue right now is that many people are being squeezed out of their homes by predatory park owners and those that aren't currently in that situation (like myself) could very well find themselves in that situation with no other place to go? I don't think she had thought of things like that. Why should I accept funds to upgrade my mobile home when at any time I could find myself having to walk away from it--it doesn't make sense. Same thing with an EV. I said the big problem from the standpoint of the "little person" is that a lot of these climate change "solutions" sound an awful lot like "Let them eat cake." I also pointed out that it is a lot more efficient climate-wise and environment-wise to put 100 families in an apartment complex than it is to let them all buy lots in a subdivision--should we pass zoning laws to phase out single-family housing? She said to me, horrified, "That sounds like Soviet Russia!" Exactly. When you are busy running around passing laws to restrict this and ban that in the name of the greater good--and especially without offering practical, workable alternatives, that is exactly what you are doing. And that is exactly what many of her "allies" ARE doing and ARE proposing. I think I may have opened her eyes somewhat.